It says in its title: “RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS…” but that’s false because the Board was not advised of the existence of this document nor its contents.
These four Board members are acting as if they alone constitute the Board when in fact the Board consists of seven members, and at least two of them had no knowledge of this document until I found it on the FSR site and mentioned it to them, much to their shock.
This resolution is posted on the FSR portal which is accessible to all residents (that’s how I discovered it).
In addition, the HOA’s legal invoices from the lawyers are for the most part also not privileged: anyone can ask for copies of them as I have done in the past, and the part about this resolution would not be redacted because it doesn’t concern HOA personnel or pending litigation.
This was not a litigation issue or even a personnel issue, so it’s not privileged under Florida statute 720.303, and it should have been raised at a duly noticed Board meeting so that the residents and other Board members could be aware of it.
And yet a review of the legal invoices from the HOA attorneys shows an entry on March 28, 2022 as follows: “work with Brian relative to requested resolution.” Brian Meanley is another lawyer in the attorney’s office and this entry was attributed to attorney Lou Caplan.
So, who requested legal work on behalf of the HOA “relative to requested resolution?” We know of no other resolution to which this could possibly refer. And why was this done without the knowledge of all equal Board members?
It bears repeating and emphasizing that absolutely none of this is “Board eyes only” material. All of it consists of documents that all HOA members are entitled by law to read and copy.
Now, Richard has been going ballistic whenever I, Arthur, or Sue mention something legal (anyone else is free to do so even with no legal training, as proven in the June 15, 2022 Board meeting when others were flinging around the words “hearsay” and “harassment” with total abandon and with no objection by Richard or anyone).
His objection is that I don’t have a Florida law license and therefore I cannot opine about statutes and legal language in contracts, even though in fact the analysis is exactly the same when reviewing either and/or both.
So others are free to discuss what hearsay is and what constitutes harassment under the law, but Vicki Roberts, a litigator for almost 40 years, is disqualified from opining about anything remotely resembling a legal theory on any topic according to Richard.
Well, guess what: Richard is not listed in the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation under CPA licenses. That’s right, he’s not there. Yet this document claims he is a CPA. This is a Florida-specific document relevant to the HOA, which is a Florida corporation, and the access in question concerns Florida business only.
Florida has a Board of Accountancy and a Department of Business and Professional Regulation. There are specific requirements in order to obtain and maintain a license as a CPA in Florida. One may not hold oneself out as a CPA in Florida if one is not licensed as a CPA in Florida, despite the fact that two plus two is four whether you’re a CPA here or anywhere.
Richard has been particularly interested in repeatedly calling out me, a seasoned lawyer, who is licensed elsewhere but somehow not qualified to read legal documents and statutes here in Florida, so it is particularly ironic now that we find out that he suffers from the same lack of Floridian licensure.
This, however, is far worse, because he signed a document stating he was a CPA. In fact, I have never done such a thing on a Florida document, nor have I ever represented to anyone that I am a lawyer here in Florida, because I’m not. I have an active California license.
However, this guy, Richard Greene, signs his name to a Florida legal document attesting to the fact that he is a CPA, and he is not on the roll of CPAs here in Florida.
He has not passed a test, taken required continuing education, or fulfilled any of the requirements to call himself a CPA here in Florida.
In fact, he doesn’t even have an active CPA license from his original home state. Here is a printout of the official New York State license verification page for Richard, which shows that his CPA license is, in fact, INACTIVE. Take a look: